|


WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME FUN!
You've come here because you want to write some Hobbit fan
fiction, and you probably have one or more very good ideas
rolling around in your head - those are called "Plot Bunnies",
and many plot bunnies develope into some pretty good reading.
You are limited in many ways only by your imagination - but I
say that with a few words of warning.
In the first place, if you are familiar principally with the
"Lord of the Rings" movies, you already have a very powerful
impression of how things should be done. The look, the sounds
and sights - all of these have been worked out for you ahead of
time; and if you are most comfortable with this version of LOTR,
then by all means feel free to express yourself. There are many
things that can be done within this version of Tolkien's reality
that will provide some great entertainment for everyone.
However, if you are not yet familiar with the books - and they
came along quite some time before the movies did - you will
notice that despite the many similarities, there are also some
very significant differences. In fairness to yourself and your
readers, you need to know what some of these things are, because
the long-standing Tolkien fan will probably catch them faster
than you can say "Gollum". So you you will want to be mindful
of the places the movies and the books do not always correspond
with each other.

THERE ARE DIFFERENCES!
We established fairly early on in both the books and the
movies that Bilbo Baggins is one hundred and eleven years old -
"eleventy-one" in Hobbit talk - at the start of LOTR. This is
an undeniable fact, and Bilbo is actually Tolkien's most
important Hobbit. He's the little guy who started it all, and
he is treated with respect from start to finish as "the founder"
of the whole story. His portrayal in the films is completely
faithful to the books, and so there should be no problem in
portraying him in your fiction.
It is another story entirely with the other four Hobbits!
In the movies, one gets the impression of four young Hobbits
in their "tweens", which actually corresponds to human
teenagers since Hobbits live longer than humans, and do not come
to maturity until they are around thirty. They come of legal
age at thirty-three.
In the films, one gets the imprssion that Sam is the oldest,
and Frodo possibly the youngest, with the others somewhere in
between.
In the books, in fact, Frodo's birthday was also celebrated
with Bilbo's since they were both born on September 22. And
while the party was a going-away show for Bilbo, it was also
Frodo's coming-of-age party - a fact unfortunately ignored by
the movies. So Frodo was actually 33 years old, but more or
less is the same as a young Human of about twenty-one. At the
time of the big party, Merry would have been nineteen, Sam right
ahead of him at twenty-one, and Pippin bringing up the rear at
a mere thirteen! Keep in mind that in Hobbit reckoning, this
made Sam and Merry the equivilent of teenage boys, and Pippin a
child. Seventeen full years pass between the night of the party
and the night Frodo and his friends leave the Shire. This makes
Frodo a mature Hobbit of fifty, or the equivilent of a human in
his mid-thirties. If he appears no older than the others,
Tolkien makes it quite clear that this is due to the Ring, and
the deception it gives of eternal youth. Merry and Sam are therefore
a few years younger, but Pippin in his late twenties,
is like a teenage boy. This actually goes a long way toward
explaining his immaturity and apparent "foolishness".

OH, THOSE FRIENDSHIPS!
"Lord of the Rings" is all about friendships and the power
of friendships. To understand this, we must first remember that
Professor Tolkien fought during World War One--one of the
ugliest wars in modern centuries, and almost all of his friends
were killed at the front. He learned first-hand the power and
strength of friendships during war, and in many ways the
Fellowship was a tribute to those friends, most of whom perished
on the battlefield. There are many such messages buried within
the pages of the books and within the images on the screen.
Some people have tried to read more into these friendships than
Tolkien intended, and out of respect for Tolkien (as well as my
personal dislike for the genre), such material as "slash" will
never be permitted on this site--sorry, ladies.
A number of friendships are established in the books and
films, and because they are so important to the story, let's get
them untangled a little and see who is allied to who.
First of all is the friendship between FRODO and SAM. As
everyone has observed, theirs is a very intense friendship, and
often at the heart of the story - but it was NOT always that way!
The movies show Frodo and Sam as close personal friends from the
very start, but in the books, it was actually Frodo and Merry
who were close friends. Frodo grew up in Buckland, and so he
knew Merry most of his life. Sam was, in fact, a servant. The
social classes among Hobbits were similar to those of England,
because this was the world professor Tolkien understood. Frodo's
friendship with Sam does not truly begin to develope until after
they are well on their journey together.
MERRY and PIPPIN also are not such close friends in the books
as they are in the movies - at least not until after their ordeal
with the orcs and uruks and their time spent with the Ents. It
is through mutual adversity that their friendship cements, and
they remain very close from that point on.
Let's not forget the story's other relationships, either!
In the films, ARAGORN and LEGOLAS are shown to be already
well acquainted at the start of the story, and have obviously
been good friends for years. In the books, however, Aragorn
was closest to Gandalf, not the Elf. In fact, he actually
developes at fast friendship with EOMER as the story progresses.
LEGOLAS is remembered for his fast and unusual friendship
with GIMLI the Dwarf. In the movies, they barely speak to each
other before their stay in Lothlorien and the battle of Helm's
Deep, and almost to the bitter end they remain on a slightly
adversarial level with each other. Only before the Gates of
Mordor does Gimli grumble about never dreaming he'd die fighting
beside an Elf, whereupon Legolas responds "...or fighting beside
a friend." Only then does stubborn Gimli realize that he and
the Elf have indeed become close friends, in spite of himself.
In the books, however, they formed a friendship as lasting as
the one between Merry and Pippin, much earlier in the story,
actually beginning during their stay in Lothlorien.
The reason I place such emphasis on this is because these
strong, heroic friendships form such a powerful theme in Tolkien
that I believe you need to get it right in order to make your
writings believable. Indeed, this is one of the great appeals
of the story - lasting and powerful friendships.

OTHER PEOPLE AND PLACES
One of the first things you will notice about the books vs
the movies is that a LOT of material was left out of the films.
This was obviously because even in three very long films, on the
DVD versions averaging three and a half hours each, there was no
effective way of telling every fragment of the story, with every
event and nuance intact. They did an admirable job, but you
still may want to see what the books have to offer, because the
material is incredibly rich.
For instance, Gandalf is not seen in the Shire for many years
during his efforts to find out if Bilbo's Ring is indeed the
terrible One Ring of Sauron. In the movies, he is certain
almost from the start. In the books, he is not so sure since
there are seven rings not fully accounted for at that time, and
he enlists the aide of Aragorn in tracking down Gollum. Gollum
is held prisoner by the King of the Mirkwood Elves, which is
presumably what leads to Legolas' involvement in the Quest, at
his father's behest. This is not revealed until the Council of
Elrond, but the seemingly liesure pace of Gandalf's search is
whatlulls Frodo into forgetting how serious a danger the Ring
would be for him.
One of the most famous portions of "Lord of the Rings" is a
segment which never makes its way into any of the filmed
versions. From the time Frodo, Sam and Pippin encounter Farmer
Maggot on the far end of the Shire until the time the Hobbits
reach Bree, a full five chapters of fascinating, action-packed,
and delightful storyline goes by. I hesitate to say too much
because if you haven't read the books, I would prefer that you
did. But it has to do with Farmer Maggot's farmhouse, a creepy
journey to Buckland, and a hair-raising walk through the Old
Forest, which is full of malevelent huorns and a delightful
faerie creature named Tom Bombadil and his bride, the river
sprite Goldberry. And as if that isn't enough, they have to
cross a foggy field of burial mounds, haunted by the ghosts of
angry kings slain in ancient battle with the infamous Witch King
of Angmar. And all that before they finally stumble onto Bree!
GALADRIEL: In the movies, she was austere and a little
frightening before she was tested by the Ring. In the books,
this was not the case. In fact, her desire to take the ring
seems never more than casual thinking on her part, and like
Gandalf earlier, she tells Frodo that it would be a terrible
thing if she ever took it. She is always regal, kindly, and a
vision of wisdom and gentleness.
ELVES and DWARVES: Call it years of being spoiled by Star
Trek, but they come across in the movies as lovable Vulcans
and Klingons. In the books, this is again not entirely the
case. The Elves in the books are merry and playful as well as
a bit sad and etherial. Dwarves, in contrast, are very serious
artisans and craftsmen as well as warriors. None of this is
fully explored in the films.
ELROND: In the movie, delightfully austere. In the books,
wize and gentle, second only to Gandalf. As Tolkien says, he is
as "kind as summer". The movie's Elrond is rather stern.
BOROMIR and FARAMIR: In the books, these brothers were almost
polar opposites - Boromir the impulsive one, arrogant enough to
think he can control the Ring, but still brave and fond of the
Hobbits. Faramir, on the other hand, is cautious and careful
to make judgements. He is also comepletely trustworthy when it
comes to the Ring. In the movies, however, they are portrayed
as somewhat different. Boromir in the films is very human and
vulnerable, even lovable. He genuinely loves the Hobbits, and
is absolutely sincere, even when he tries to take the Ring from
Frodo. Faramir is a soldier whose sole desire is to please his
father, a man impossible for him to please. He seems somewhat
weaker in the films than he was in the books, but he still
holds our affection and sympathy.
ARWEN: Her presence in the movies is the most fully developed
than in the books, where she was a background character. She
was important, yes - but her story was primarily told in the
Appendexes, and she makes only two brief appearances in the
story itself. In a book about friendships and male bonding,
her story was "less important", which is too bad. She is one of
the characters who comes off in the films greatly improved -
an etherial princess, but someone who in a pinch can take care
of herself.
ROHAN and GONDOR: The fabulous Riders of Rohan have long
been my favorite humans in the story, and there are several
great characters to remember. They are much the same in the
films as in the novel, except that Eowyn is even better in the
films.
The people of Gondor are late comers to the story, yet they
have been part of it since the beginning: represented by Strider
at Bree, then by Boromir, desperate to save his beseiged
country and to please his father, even if it means trying to
seize the Ring. In fact, we only fully understand his act of
"treachery" when we met Lord Denethor of Gondor and witness
the desperate plight of Minas Tirith.
Minas Tirith is filled with numerous minor characters that
never made it into the movies, but the one character who stands
out is Lord Denethor, Steward of Gondor. He is a hereditary
regent, himself of royal blood, who has a dark secret only
hinted at in the films. He, like Saruman, is in possession
of a palantir. Sauron has long used it to whisper words of
doom and despair, taunting him to find the Ring and challenge
him with it. He counts on the weakness of humans who might
find it, bring it to Minas Tirith, attempt to use it as a weapon
- and fail utterly. Therefore, he would win the day. In the
film, Faramir realizes this the moment he sees Frodo being set
upon by the winged nazgul.

There is so much more i could add, but the best thing I can
say at this point is to watch the movies again, for all the
nuances you need, and study the books for their wealth of
information.
Now you have enough to go on--good luck, and
may the hair on your toes never fall out!


Disclaimer: The LOTR characters are copyrighted to J.R.R.Tolkien, Tolkien Enterprises, and New Line Cinema.
The stories themselves and any original characters contained within are the exclusive property of the authors therein and may not be reproduced without written permission. © 2003

|